On the strong equality between supercompactness and strong compactness
Authors: Arthur W. Apter and Saharon Shelah
Journal: Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 349 (1997), 103-128
MSC (1991): Primary 03E35; Secondary 03E55.
MathSciNet review: 1333385
Full-text PDF Free Access
Abstract: We show that supercompactness and strong compactness can be equivalent even as properties of pairs of regular cardinals. Specifically, we show that if ZFC + GCH is a given model (which in interesting cases contains instances of supercompactness), then there is some cardinal and cofinality preserving generic extension ZFC + GCH in which, (a) (preservation) for regular, if is supercompact'', then is supercompact'' and so that, (b) (equivalence) for regular, is strongly compact'' iff is supercompact'', except possibly if is a measurable limit of cardinals which are supercompact.
- [A] Arthur W. Apter, On the least strongly compact cardinal, Israel J. Math. 35 (1980), no. 3, 225–233. MR 576474, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02761194
- [AS] A. Apter, S. Shelah, ``Menas' Result is Best Possible'', Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. (to appear).
- [Ba] James E. Baumgartner, Iterated forcing, Surveys in set theory, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., vol. 87, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1983, pp. 1–59. MR 823775, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511758867.002
- [Bu] Set theory, Handbook of mathematical logic, Part B, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977, pp. 317–522. Studies in Logic and Foundations of Math., Vol. 90. With contributions by J. R. Shoenfield, Thomas J. Jech, Kenneth Kunen, John P. Burgess, Keith J. Devlin, Mary Ellen Rudin and I. Juhász. MR 0540758
- [C] James Cummings, A model in which GCH holds at successors but fails at limits, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 329 (1992), no. 1, 1–39. MR 1041044, https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1992-1041044-9
- [CW] J. Cummings, H. Woodin, Generalised Prikry Forcings, circulated manuscript of a forthcoming book.
- [J] Thomas Jech, Set theory, Academic Press [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers], New York-London, 1978. Pure and Applied Mathematics. MR 506523
- [KaM] A. Kanamori and M. Magidor, The evolution of large cardinal axioms in set theory, Higher set theory (Proc. Conf., Math. Forschungsinst., Oberwolfach, 1977), Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 669, Springer, Berlin, 1978, pp. 99–275. MR 520190
- [KiM] Y. Kimchi, M. Magidor, ``The Independence between the Concepts of Compactness and Supercompactness'', circulated manuscript.
- [Ma1] Menachem Magidor, How large is the first strongly compact cardinal? or A study on identity crises, Ann. Math. Logic 10 (1976), no. 1, 33–57. MR 429566, https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4843(76)90024-3
- [Ma2] M. Magidor, On the role of supercompact and extendible cardinals in logic, Israel J. Math. 10 (1971), 147–157. MR 295904, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02771565
- [Ma3] M. Magidor, There are many normal ultrafiltres corresponding to a supercompact cardinal, Israel J. Math. 9 (1971), 186–192. MR 347607, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02771583
- [Ma4] M. Magidor, unpublished; personal communication.
- [Me] Telis K. Menas, On strong compactness and supercompactness, Ann. Math. Logic 7 (1974/75), 327–359. MR 357121, https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4843(75)90009-1
- [MS] Alan H. Mekler and Saharon Shelah, When 𝜅-free implies strongly 𝜅-free, Abelian group theory (Oberwolfach, 1985) Gordon and Breach, New York, 1987, pp. 137–148. MR 1011309
- [SRK] Robert M. Solovay, William N. Reinhardt, and Akihiro Kanamori, Strong axioms of infinity and elementary embeddings, Ann. Math. Logic 13 (1978), no. 1, 73–116. MR 482431, https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4843(78)90031-1
- A. Apter, ``On the Least Strongly Compact Cardinal", Israel J. Math. 35, 1980, 225-233. MR 81h:03099
- A. Apter, S. Shelah, ``Menas' Result is Best Possible'', Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. (to appear).
- J. Baumgartner, ``Iterated Forcing", in: A. Mathias, ed., Surveys in Set Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1983, 1-59. MR 87c:03099
- J. Burgess, ``Forcing", in: J. Barwise, ed., Handbook of Mathematical Logic, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977, 403-452. MR 58:27475
- J. Cummings, ``A Model in which GCH Holds at Successors but Fails at Limits'', Transactions AMS 329, 1992, 1-39. MR 92h:03076
- J. Cummings, H. Woodin, Generalised Prikry Forcings, circulated manuscript of a forthcoming book.
- T. Jech, Set Theory, Academic Press, New York, 1978. MR 80a:03062
- A. Kanamori, M. Magidor, ``The Evolution of Large Cardinal Axioms in Set Theory", in: Lecture Notes in Mathematics 669, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1978, 99-275. MR 80b:03083
- Y. Kimchi, M. Magidor, ``The Independence between the Concepts of Compactness and Supercompactness'', circulated manuscript.
- M. Magidor, ``How Large is the First Strongly Compact Cardinal?", Annals Math. Logic 10, 1976, 33-57. MR 55:2578
- M. Magidor, ``On the Role of Supercompact and Extendible Cardinals in Logic", Israel J. Math. 10, 1971, 147-157. MR 45:4966
- M. Magidor, ``There are Many Normal Ultrafilters Corresponding to a Supercompact Cardinal", Israel J. Math. 9, 1971, 186-192. MR 50:110
- M. Magidor, unpublished; personal communication.
- T. Menas, ``On Strong Compactness and Supercompactness", Annals Math. Logic 7, 1975, 327-359. MR 50:9589
- A. Mekler, S. Shelah, ``When -Free Implies Strongly -Free", in: Proceedings of the Third Conference on Abelian Group Theory, Gordon and Breach, Salzburg, 1987, 137-148. MR 90f:20082
- R. Solovay, W. Reinhardt, A. Kanamori, ``Strong Axioms of Infinity and Elementary Embeddings", Annals Math. Logic 13, 1978, 73-116. MR 80h:03072
Arthur W. Apter
Affiliation: Department of Mathematics, Baruch College of CUNY, New York, New York 10010
Affiliation: Department of Mathematics, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel; Department of Mathematics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08904
Email: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
Keywords: Strongly compact cardinal, supercompact cardinal.
Received by editor(s): May 2, 1994
Received by editor(s) in revised form: December 30, 1994
Additional Notes: The research of the first author was partially supported by PSC-CUNY Grant 662341 and a salary grant from Tel Aviv University. In addition, the first author wishes to thank the Mathematics Departments of The Hebrew University and Tel Aviv University for the hospitality shown him during his sabbatical in Israel. The second author wishes to thank the Basic Research Fund of the Israeli Academy of Sciences for partially supporting this research, which is Publication 495 of the second author.
Article copyright: © Copyright 1997 American Mathematical Society