On comparing Adams and natural spline multistep formulas
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer
- by David R. Hill PDF
- Math. Comp. 29 (1975), 741-745 Request permission
Abstract:
This paper presents two techniques for the comparison of Adams formulas and methods based on natural splines. A rigorous foundation to the claim that a pth order natural spline formula produces better results than a pth order Adams method, but not quite as good as a $(p + 1)$st order Adams formula is given for $p = 2,3,4$, which suggests the general case.References
- George D. Andria, George D. Byrne, and David R. Hill, Integration formulas and schemes based on $g$-splines, Math. Comp. 27 (1973). MR 339460, DOI 10.1090/S0025-5718-1973-0339460-5
- L. Fox, The numerical solution of two-point boundary problems in ordinary differential equations, Oxford University Press, New York, 1957. MR 0102178
- Peter Henrici, Discrete variable methods in ordinary differential equations, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York-London, 1962. MR 0135729 D. R. HILL, An Approach to the Numerical Solution of Delay Differential Equations, Ph. D. Thesis, University of Pittsburgh, 1973.
- T. E. Hull and A. C. R. Newbery, Corrector formulas for multi-step integration methods, J. Soc. Indust. Appl. Math. 10 (1962), 351–369. MR 152150
- Leon Lapidus and John H. Seinfeld, Numerical solution of ordinary differential equations, Mathematics in Science and Engineering, Vol. 74, Academic Press, New York-London, 1971. MR 0281355
Additional Information
- © Copyright 1975 American Mathematical Society
- Journal: Math. Comp. 29 (1975), 741-745
- MSC: Primary 65L05
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-1975-0375781-X
- MathSciNet review: 0375781