Skip to Main Content

Mathematics of Computation

Published by the American Mathematical Society since 1960 (published as Mathematical Tables and other Aids to Computation 1943-1959), Mathematics of Computation is devoted to research articles of the highest quality in computational mathematics.

ISSN 1088-6842 (online) ISSN 0025-5718 (print)

The 2020 MCQ for Mathematics of Computation is 1.78.

What is MCQ? The Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) measures journal impact by looking at citations over a five-year period. Subscribers to MathSciNet may click through for more detailed information.

 

An alternating direction method of multipliers with a worst-case $O(1/n^2)$ convergence rate
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer

by Wenyi Tian and Xiaoming Yuan HTML | PDF
Math. Comp. 88 (2019), 1685-1713 Request permission

Abstract:

The alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) is being widely used for various convex programming models with separable structures arising in many scientific computing areas. The ADMM’s worst-case $O(1/n)$ convergence rate measured by the iteration complexity has been established in the literature when its penalty parameter is a constant, where $n$ is the iteration counter. Research on ADMM’s worst-case $O(1/n^2)$ convergence rate, however, is still in its infancy. In this paper, we suggest applying a rule proposed recently by Chambolle and Pock to iteratively update the penalty parameter and show that the ADMM with this adaptive penalty parameter has a worst-case $O(1/n^2)$ convergence rate in the ergodic sense. Without a strong convexity requirement on the objective function, our assumptions on the model are mild and can be satisfied by some representative applications. We test the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) model and numerically verify the significant acceleration effectiveness of the faster ADMM with a worst-case $O(1/n^2)$ convergence rate. Moreover, the faster ADMM is more favorable than the ADMM with a constant penalty parameter, as the former is much less sensitive to the initial value of the penalty parameter and can sometimes produce very high-accuracy solutions.
References
Similar Articles
  • Retrieve articles in Mathematics of Computation with MSC (2010): 90C25, 65K10
  • Retrieve articles in all journals with MSC (2010): 90C25, 65K10
Additional Information
  • Wenyi Tian
  • Affiliation: Center for Applied Mathematics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, People’s Republic of China
  • MR Author ID: 999800
  • Email: twymath@gmail.com
  • Xiaoming Yuan
  • Affiliation: Department of Mathematics, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China
  • MR Author ID: 729439
  • Email: xmyuan@hku.hk
  • Received by editor(s): July 20, 2016
  • Received by editor(s) in revised form: September 3, 2017, May 9, 2018, and June 8, 2018
  • Published electronically: December 12, 2018
  • Additional Notes: The first author was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11701416).
    The second author was partially supported by the General Research Fund from Hong Kong Research Grants Council: 12313516.
  • © Copyright 2018 American Mathematical Society
  • Journal: Math. Comp. 88 (2019), 1685-1713
  • MSC (2010): Primary 90C25, 65K10
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/mcom/3388
  • MathSciNet review: 3925481