Surveyors can work on a small scale (accurately siting the corners of a building on its plot) or a very large one (charting the path of a proposed highway) but their work always involves measurements in the field. ...
Print this article 
Tradition has it that geometry (literally, earthmeasurement) began when the ancient Egyptians had to reestablish boundary lines between fields after the annual floods of the Nile; the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization still recommends using a (3, 4, 5) triangle to set out right angles in survey work, a procedure that may well go back to the pharaohs. Today, surveyors continue to make explicit use of plane geometry and trigonometry on a daytoday basis. Along with their seafaring cousins, the navigators, they may be the most geometrical of all professions. My plan in this column is to sample some of the more elementary current surveying procedures from a mathematical point of view, using The Surveying Handbook (edited by Russel Brinker and Roy Minnick, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1987) as my source.
It must be noted that at least one mathematician was a worldclass surveyor. Laplace had advised the Académie des Sciences in 1791 on a new survey of the Paris meridian from Dunkerque to Barcelona (in order to establish the exact size of the earth and hence the length of the meter; the French Revolution had washed away, along with the traditional divisions of land, the units that had measured them). But Gauss himself conducted a survey of the state of Hanover between 1821 and 1825, and continued to direct work on refinements of the grid. One of the nine volumes of his collected works is entirely devoted to geodesy.
A detail of the triangulation of Hanover carried out under Gauss's supervision between 1820 and 1850. The pink lines are part of the Hauptsystem (main system) laid out by Gauss himself in 18211825. Collected Works, Volume 9, p. 347.
According to the American Society of Civil Engineers, surveying is (in part) "The science and art of making all essential measurements in space to determine the relative positions of points and/or physical and cultural details above, on or beneath the earth's surface and to depict them in usable form." The words "in space" are significant: surveying is an outdoor activity. Surveyors can work on a small scale (accurately siting the corners of a building on its plot) or a very large one (charting the path of a proposed highway) but their work always involves measurements in the field.
One essential surveying task is "to prolong a straight line forward from an existing point." This is part of marking out on the terrain what will be a straight line on the map. If all points are visible from the starting point, line of sight may be used. But suppose a line has been drawn from point A to point B (in sight), and must be extended beyond B to a point visible from B but out of sight of A. Here is the procedure: move the transit (the surveyor's telescope) to B, backsight on A, "plunge" the transit (rotate it forwards in a vertical plane) and sight a new point C. This procedure requires two surveyors, one to look through the telescope and one to move a marker until it lines up with the telescope's axis; once executed it can be repeated to extend a line over hill and dale.


When the line needs extending through an obstruction, some more geometry comes into play. From the Handbook: "The transit is set up at B and deflection angle α, no larger than needed to clear the obstruction, is turned to locate C. Point C is occupied and an angle 2α is turned in the opposite direction from the first angle. D is established on the resulting prolongation of AB at the same distance as BC. Occupying D and turning a deflection angle α in the same direction as angle B produces line ABD ahead to E."


A typical survey results in a map (also called "a survey"): a 2dimensional representation of part of the earth's surface. A map being flat shows all points on the same level; but the surface of the earth is rarely flat. I am not referring here to the curvature of the earth which largescale surveys must take into account but to the local ups and downs that every cyclist is aware of. One of the jobs of the surveyor is to convert measurements taken on the undulating actual surface of the planet into data that represent positions on the ideal, perfectly level plane of the survey. As the Handbook remarks, "Considerable practice is required for field personnel to do accurate taping in hilly or rolling terrain."
This is the first place where trigonometry is mentioned in the Handbook. "In reducing slope measurements to their horizontal lengths, ..., a correction must be applied to the measured distance equal to the difference between the hypotenuse l and side d of a right triangle having its vertical side h." Sometimes the height difference h between two points can be measured directly. In that case the correction is given as C_{h} = h^{2}/2l + h^{4}/8l^{3}. At other times the only possible measurement is the inclination from the horizontal of the line between the points; in terms of this angle α (the "vertical angle") the correction is C_{h} = l(1  cos α).


Trigonometry also enters into the measurement of distances when the operation is carried out optically, using stadia lines.
This procedure is called stadia tacheometry (or tachymetry), referring to the speed with which it can be carried out. To measure the distance from point A to point B, the surveyor at A focuses a telescope equipped with stadia lines on a graduated vertical rule held by the surveyor at B. The stadia lines are two short horizontal lines drawn above and below a central horizontal line in the focal plane of the telescope; these lines appear superimposed on the image and intersect a length S ("the stadia intercept") on the rule held at B, which can be read off by the observer. The distance between the stadia lines is such that if the observation is made horizontally, the distance D between A and B is 100 times the stadia intercept: D = 100 S.


Now suppose stadia tacheometry is carried out on a slope. The angle α of the slope between points A and B will affect the stadia intercept.
In the slanted perspective, points on the rule seem closer to each other than they are, so the apparent stadia intercept is too large; multiplying it by a factor of cos α has the same effect as turning the rule to be perpendicular to the line of sight, and corrects the distortion due to the angle. The straightline distance from A to B is then D =100 S cos α. The horizontal distance from A to B will require an additional factor of cos α , as above, while the vertical distance is given by h = 100 S cos α sin α = 100 S (1/2) sin 2α, as recorded in the Handbook.
From the Handbook: "Land is ordinarily bought and sold on a basis of cost per unit area. For this reason as well as many others, an accurate determination of tract area is often necessary." The surveyor measures angles and distances. Once a "closed traverse" has been accomplished, i.e. a series of line segments that comes back to its initial point, the enclosed area (the "traverse area") may be computed. The Handbook explains three methods: the DMD method (for Double Meridian Distance), the coordinate method (both of these require a rectangular coordinate system), and the measurement of area by planimeter.
The DMD method. First some terminology: The latitude of a line segment is "its orthographic projection onto the northsouth axis of the survey. North latitudes are considered positive, south latitudes negative" its departure makes analogous use of the eastwest axis. In the DMD method we associate to each segment of the traverse its meridian distance: the perpendicular distance from its midpoint to the northsouth axis. The DMD method calculates the traverse area by mutliplying the latitude and meridian distance of each line in the traverse, summing those products, and taking the absolute value of the sum. (The Handbook uses the double meridian distance, somewhat handier to calculate from the departures of consecutive lines, and then divides by 2 at the end; hence the name DMD).


The coordinate method. This method uses (x,y) coordinates for all the corners in the traverse. The procedure is "to multiply the xcoordinate of each corner by the difference between adjacent ycoordinates, add the resulting products, and take half the absolute value of the sum." The Handbook gives the formula:
A = [x_{1}(y_{2}  y_{n}) + x_{2}(y_{3}  y_{1}) + ... + x_{n}(y_{1}  y_{n1})]/2.


The planimeter method. This method will be discussed more in detail in next month's column. Here let me remark that the underlying mathematics is directly related to the coordinate method. Suppose we want to evaluate the area enclosed by a traverse given parametrically as x = f (t), y = g(t), for t running from a to b, with f(a) = f(b) and g(a) = g(b). We can approximate the curve with an nsegment polygonal line by taking Δt = (b  a)/n, setting t_{0} = a , t_{1} = a + Δt, t_{2} = a + 2 Δt, ... t_{n} = a +n Δt = b, and considering the traverse with corners at (f(t_{i}), g(t_{i})), i = 1 ... n (note that 0 and n give the same corner) and with enclosed area A_{n}. The Handbook's formula for the polygonal area gives (distributing the 1/2)
A_{n} = [f(t_{1})[g(t_{2})  g(t_{n})]/2 + [f(t_{2})[g(t_{3})  g(t_{1})]/2 + ... + [f(t_{n})[g(t_{1})  g(t_{n1})]/2.
In the ith term, the factor [g(t_{i+1})  g(t_{i1})]/2 can be written, as a first order approximation, as [g'(t_{i}) (2 Δt)]/2, giving A_{n} approximately as f(t_{1})g'(t_{1}) Δt + ... + f(t_{n})g'(t_{n}) Δt. In the limit as n goes to infinity these sums converge to the integral which planimeters are designed to compute.
Often in construction projects large quantities of material must be excavated at one place (a "borrow pit") to be filled in at another. The Handbook gives a procedure for estimating the amount of material that has been removed: The surveyors set up a horizontal grid over the area to be excavated (grid lines lines are typically 30 or 40 feet apart). Height measurements in feet are made at all the grid points before and after the excavation. The points are labelled 1, 2, 3 or 4 according to the number of grid rectangles they abut, and the volume estimate is given schematically by the formula
V = (A/4) (Σ h_{1} + 2Σ h_{2} + 3Σ h_{3} + 4Σ h_{4})
where A is the area of a grid rectangle, and Σ h_{1} represents the sum of all the height differences coming from grid points abutting only 1 square, Σ h_{2} is the sum coming from points abutting 2 squares, etc. The Handbook's formula has an extra 27 in the denominator to give a result in cubic yards.


Next month, Bill Casselman will have Part II of the mathematics of surveying.