Remote Access Representation Theory
Green Open Access

Representation Theory

ISSN 1088-4165

 
 

 

Classification of discrete series by minimal $ K$-type


Author: Rajagopalan Parthasarathy
Journal: Represent. Theory 19 (2015), 167-185
MSC (2010): Primary 22E46; Secondary 22D30
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/ert/467
Published electronically: October 7, 2015
MathSciNet review: 3405535
Full-text PDF Free Access

Abstract | References | Similar Articles | Additional Information

Abstract: Following the proof by Hecht and Schmid of Blattner's conjecture for $ K$ multiplicities of representations belonging to the discrete series it turned out that some results which were earlier known with some hypothesis on the Harish-Chandra parameter of the discrete series representation could be extended removing those hypotheses. For example this was so for the geometric realization problem. Occasionally a few other results followed by first proving them for Harish-Chandra parameters which are sufficiently regular and then using Zuckerman translation functors, wall crossing methods, etc. Recently, Hongyu He raised the question (private communication) of whether the characterization of a discrete series representation by its lowest $ K$-type, which was proved by this author and R. Hotta with some hypothesis on the Harish-Chandra parameter of the discrete series representations, can be extended to all discrete series representations excluding none, using a combination of these powerful techniques. In this article we will answer this question using Dirac operator methods and a result of Susana Salamanca-Riba.


References [Enhancements On Off] (What's this?)

  • [1] R. Hotta and R. Parthasarathy, Multiplicity formulae for discrete series, Invent. Math. 26 (1974), 133-178. MR 0348041 (50 #539)
  • [2] Jing-Song Huang and Pavle Pandžić, Dirac cohomology, unitary representations and a proof of a conjecture of Vogan, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 15 (2002), no. 1, 185-202 (electronic). MR 1862801 (2002h:22022), https://doi.org/10.1090/S0894-0347-01-00383-6
  • [3] Jing-Song Huang and Pavle Pandžić, Dirac operators in representation theory, Mathematics: Theory & Applications, Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 2006. MR 2244116 (2007j:22025)
  • [4] Bertram Kostant, Lie algebra cohomology and the generalized Borel-Weil theorem, Ann. of Math. (2) 74 (1961), 329-387. MR 0142696 (26 #265)
  • [5] Harish-Chandra, On the theory of the Eisenstein integral, Conference on Harmonic Analysis (Univ. Maryland, College Park, Md., 1971), Springer, Berlin, 1972, pp. 123-149. Lecture Notes in Math., Vol. 266. MR 0399355 (53 #3200)
  • [6] Harish-Chandra, Harmonic analysis on real reductive groups. I. The theory of the constant term, J. Functional Analysis 19 (1975), 104-204. MR 0399356 (53 #3201)
  • [7] K. R. Parthasarathy, R. Ranga Rao, and V. S. Varadarajan, Representations of complex semi-simple Lie groups and Lie algebras, Ann. of Math. (2) 85 (1967), 383-429. MR 0225936 (37 #1526)
  • [8] R. Parthasarathy, Dirac operator and the discrete series, Ann. of Math. (2) 96 (1972), 1-30. MR 0318398 (47 #6945)
  • [9] R. Parthasarathy, Criteria for the unitarizability of some highest weight modules, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Sect. A Math. Sci. 89 (1980), no. 1, 1-24. http://repository.ias.ac.in/82621/. MR 573381 (82c:22020)
  • [10] R. Parthasarathy, A generalization of the Enright-Varadarajan modules, Compositio Math. 36 (1978), no. 1, 53-73. http://repository.ias.ac.in/82622/. MR 515037 (80f:22016)
  • [11] Susana A. Salamanca-Riba, On the unitary dual of real reductive Lie groups and the $ A_g(\lambda )$ modules: the strongly regular case, Duke Math. J. 96 (1999), no. 3, 521-546. MR 1671213 (2000a:22023), https://doi.org/10.1215/S0012-7094-99-09616-3
  • [12] Anthony W. Knapp and David A. Vogan Jr., Cohomological induction and unitary representations, Princeton Mathematical Series, vol. 45, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1995. MR 1330919 (96c:22023)
  • [13] Nolan R. Wallach, Real reductive groups. I, Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 132, Academic Press, Inc., Boston, MA, 1988. MR 929683 (89i:22029)
  • [14] V. S. Varadarajan, George Mackey and his work on representation theory and foundations of physics, Group representations, ergodic theory, and mathematical physics: a tribute to George W. Mackey, Contemp. Math., vol. 449, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2008, pp. 417-446. MR 2391814 (2009i:22005), https://doi.org/10.1090/conm/449/08722
  • [15] V. S. Varadarajan, Some mathematical reminiscences, Methods Appl. Anal. 9 (2002), no. 3, v-xviii. MR 2023128 (2005d:60001), https://doi.org/10.4310/MAA.2002.v9.n3.a2
  • [16] Apoorva Khare, Representations of complex semi-simple Lie groups and Lie algebras, Connected at infinity. II, Texts Read. Math., vol. 67, Hindustan Book Agency, New Delhi, 2013, pp. 85-129. arXiv:1208.0416v2 [math.RT]. MR 3135123
  • [17] A. W. Knapp and E. M. Stein, Intertwining operators for semisimple groups. II, Invent. Math. 60 (1980), no. 1, 9-84. MR 582703 (82a:22018), https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01389898
  • [18] David A. Vogan Jr. and Gregg J. Zuckerman, Unitary representations with nonzero cohomology, Compositio Math. 53 (1984), no. 1, 51-90. MR 762307 (86k:22040)
  • [19] David A. Vogan Jr., Unitarizability of certain series of representations, Ann. of Math. (2) 120 (1984), no. 1, 141-187. MR 750719 (86h:22028), https://doi.org/10.2307/2007074
  • [20] S. Kumaresan, On the canonical $ k$-types in the irreducible unitary $ g$-modules with nonzero relative cohomology, Invent. Math. 59 (1980), no. 1, 1-11. MR 575078 (83c:17011), https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01390311
  • [21] Wilfried Schmid, On a conjecture of Langlands, Ann. of Math. (2) 93 (1971), 1-42. MR 0286942 (44 #4149)
  • [22] Wilfried Schmid, Discrete series, Representation theory and automorphic forms (Edinburgh, 1996) Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., vol. 61, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1997, pp. 83-113. MR 1476494 (98k:22051), https://doi.org/10.1090/pspum/061/1476494
  • [23] Henryk Hecht and Wilfried Schmid, A proof of Blattner's conjecture, Invent. Math. 31 (1975), no. 2, 129-154. MR 0396855 (53 #715)

Similar Articles

Retrieve articles in Representation Theory of the American Mathematical Society with MSC (2010): 22E46, 22D30

Retrieve articles in all journals with MSC (2010): 22E46, 22D30


Additional Information

Rajagopalan Parthasarathy
Affiliation: Raja Ramanna Fellow Bharathiar University Coimbatore
Email: sarathy.math.tifr@gmail.com

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/ert/467
Keywords: Dirac operator inequality, Dirac cohomology, Harish-Chandra class group, Mackey's criterion, $A_{\mathfrak q, \lambda}$
Received by editor(s): July 29, 2014
Received by editor(s) in revised form: December 4, 2014, and August 14, 2015
Published electronically: October 7, 2015
Additional Notes: This research was supported by Raja Ramanna Fellowship from DAE
The author thanks the referee for suggestions to improve the article by addressing the case of general groups of Harish-Chandra class. His comments on the initial proof of Theorem 1.1 in Section 3 have greatly helped in adding considerable clarity to the original submission.
Article copyright: © Copyright 2015 American Mathematical Society

American Mathematical Society