Publications Meetings The Profession Membership Programs Math Samplings Policy & Advocacy In the News About the AMS

Remote Access
Green Open Access
Mathematics of Computation
Mathematics of Computation
ISSN 1088-6842(online) ISSN 0025-5718(print)


Canonical construction of finite elements

Author: R. Hiptmair
Journal: Math. Comp. 68 (1999), 1325-1346
MSC (1991): Primary 65N30, 41A10, 58A15
Published electronically: May 20, 1999
MathSciNet review: 1665954
Full-text PDF Free Access

Abstract | References | Similar Articles | Additional Information

Abstract: The mixed variational formulation of many elliptic boundary value problems involves vector valued function spaces, like, in three dimensions, $\boldsymbol H(\mathbf{\operatorname{curl}};\Omega)$ and ${{\boldsymbol H}(\operatorname{Div};\Omega)}$. Thus finite element subspaces of these function spaces are indispensable for effective finite element discretization schemes. Given a simplicial triangulation of the computational domain $\Omega$, among others, Raviart, Thomas and Nédélec have found suitable conforming finite elements for $\boldsymbol H(\operatorname{Div};\Omega)$ and $\boldsymbol H(\mathbf{\operatorname{curl}};\Omega)$. At first glance, it is hard to detect a common guiding principle behind these approaches. We take a fresh look at the construction of the finite spaces, viewing them from the angle of differential forms. This is motivated by the well-known relationships between differential forms and differential operators: $\operatorname{div}$, $\operatorname{\mathbf{curl}}$ and $\operatorname{\mathbf{grad}}$ can all be regarded as special incarnations of the exterior derivative of a differential form. Moreover, in the realm of differential forms most concepts are basically dimension-independent. Thus, we arrive at a fairly canonical procedure to construct conforming finite element subspaces of function spaces related to differential forms. In any dimension we can give a simple characterization of the local polynomial spaces and degrees of freedom underlying the definition of the finite element spaces. With unprecedented ease we can recover the familiar $\boldsymbol H (\operatorname{Div};\Omega)$- and $\boldsymbol H(\mathbf{\operatorname{curl}};\Omega)$-conforming finite elements, and establish the unisolvence of degrees of freedom. In addition, the use of differential forms makes it possible to establish crucial algebraic properties of the canonical interpolation operators and representation theorems in a single sweep for all kinds of spaces.

References [Enhancements On Off] (What's this?)

Similar Articles

Retrieve articles in Mathematics of Computation of the American Mathematical Society with MSC (1991): 65N30, 41A10, 58A15

Retrieve articles in all journals with MSC (1991): 65N30, 41A10, 58A15

Additional Information

R. Hiptmair
Affiliation: Sonderforschungsbereich 382, Universität Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany

PII: S 0025-5718(99)01166-7
Keywords: Finite elements, differential forms, Raviart-Thomas elements, N\'ed\'elec elements, Whitney forms, discrete potentials
Received by editor(s): January 23, 1997
Received by editor(s) in revised form: November 10, 1997
Published electronically: May 20, 1999
Article copyright: © Copyright 1999 American Mathematical Society

Comments: Email Webmaster

© Copyright , American Mathematical Society
Contact Us · Sitemap · Privacy Statement

Connect with us Facebook Twitter Google+ LinkedIn Instagram RSS feeds Blogs YouTube Podcasts Wikipedia