Skip to Main Content

Transactions of the American Mathematical Society

Published by the American Mathematical Society since 1900, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society is devoted to longer research articles in all areas of pure and applied mathematics.

ISSN 1088-6850 (online) ISSN 0002-9947 (print)

The 2020 MCQ for Transactions of the American Mathematical Society is 1.48.

What is MCQ? The Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) measures journal impact by looking at citations over a five-year period. Subscribers to MathSciNet may click through for more detailed information.

 

Sharp Sobolev-Poincaré inequalities on compact Riemannian manifolds
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer

by Emmanuel Hebey PDF
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 354 (2002), 1193-1213 Request permission

Abstract:

Given $(M,g)$ a smooth compact Riemannian $n$-manifold, $n \ge 3$, we return in this article to the study of the sharp Sobolev-Poincaré type inequality \begin{equation*}\Vert u\Vert _{2^\star }^2 \le K_n^2\Vert \nabla u\Vert _2^2 + B\Vert u\Vert _1^2\tag *{(0.1)}\end{equation*} where $2^\star = 2n/(n-2)$ is the critical Sobolev exponent, and $K_n$ is the sharp Euclidean Sobolev constant. Druet, Hebey and Vaugon proved that $(0.1)$ is true if $n = 3$, that $(0.1)$ is true if $n \ge 4$ and the sectional curvature of $g$ is a nonpositive constant, or the Cartan-Hadamard conjecture in dimension $n$ is true and the sectional curvature of $g$ is nonpositive, but that $(0.1)$ is false if $n \ge 4$ and the scalar curvature of $g$ is positive somewhere. When $(0.1)$ is true, we define $B(g)$ as the smallest $B$ in $(0.1)$. The saturated form of $(0.1)$ reads as \begin{equation*}\Vert u\Vert _{2^\star }^2 \le K_n^2\Vert \nabla u\Vert _2^2+B(g)\Vert u\Vert _1^2. \tag *{(0.2)}\end{equation*} We assume in this article that $n \ge 4$, and complete the study by Druet, Hebey and Vaugon of the sharp Sobolev-Poincaré inequality $(0.1)$. We prove that $(0.1)$ is true, and that $(0.2)$ possesses extremal functions when the scalar curvature of $g$ is negative. A fairly complete answer to the question of the validity of $(0.1)$ under the assumption that the scalar curvature is not necessarily negative, but only nonpositive, is also given.
References
Similar Articles
  • Retrieve articles in Transactions of the American Mathematical Society with MSC (2000): 58E35
  • Retrieve articles in all journals with MSC (2000): 58E35
Additional Information
  • Emmanuel Hebey
  • Affiliation: Département de Mathématiques, Site de Saint-Martin, Université de Cergy-Pontoise, 2 avenue Adolphe Chauvin, 95302 Cergy-Pontoise cedex, France
  • Email: Emmanuel.Hebey@math.u-cergy.fr
  • Received by editor(s): November 18, 2000
  • Published electronically: November 1, 2001
  • © Copyright 2001 American Mathematical Society
  • Journal: Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 354 (2002), 1193-1213
  • MSC (2000): Primary 58E35
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-01-02913-0
  • MathSciNet review: 1867378