The adjoint representation of a reductive group and hyperplane arrangements

Author:
J. Matthew Douglass

Journal:
Represent. Theory **3** (1999), 444-456

MSC (1991):
Primary 22E46

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1090/S1088-4165-99-00066-7

Published electronically:
November 9, 1999

MathSciNet review:
1722107

Full-text PDF Free Access

Abstract | References | Similar Articles | Additional Information

Abstract: Let be a connected reductive algebraic group with Lie algebra defined over an algebraically closed field, , with . Fix a parabolic subgroup of with Levi decomposition where is the unipotent radical of . Let and let denote the center of . Let be a maximal torus in with Lie algebra . Then the root system of is a subset of and by restriction to , the roots of in determine an arrangement of hyperplanes in we denote by . In this paper we construct an isomorphism of graded -modules , where is the -module of derivations of . We also show that and are isomorphic graded -modules, so and are isomorphic, graded -modules. It follows immediately that is a free hyperplane arrangement. This result has been proved using case-by-case arguments by Orlik and Terao. By keeping track of the gradings involved, and recalling that affords a self-dual representation of , we recover a result of Sommers, Trapa, and Broer which states that the degrees in which the adjoint representation of occurs as a constituent of the graded, rational -module are the exponents of . This result has also been proved, again using case-by-case arguments, by Sommers and Trapa and independently by Broer.

**1.**Walter Borho,*Über Schichten halbeinfacher Lie-Algebren*, Invent. Math.**65**(1981/82), no. 2, 283–317 (German, with English summary). MR**641132**, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01389016**2.**Abraham Broer,*The sum of generalized exponents and Chevalley’s restriction theorem for modules of covariants*, Indag. Math. (N.S.)**6**(1995), no. 4, 385–396. MR**1365182**, https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-3577(96)81754-X**3.**A. Broer. Lectures on decomposition classes. In*Representation Theory and Algebraic Geometry, Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute, Montreal, Canada, July 28 - August 8, 1997*(A. Broer, editor). Kluwer, 1998. MR**99:03****4.**A. Broer. Hyperplane arrangements, Springer representations, and exponents. In*Advances in Geometry*, volume 172 of*Progress in Mathematics*(J. Brylinski, editor). Birkhäuser, 1999. MR**99:07****5.**Bertram Kostant,*Lie group representations on polynomial rings*, Amer. J. Math.**85**(1963), 327–404. MR**0158024**, https://doi.org/10.2307/2373130**6.**Peter Orlik and Louis Solomon,*Coxeter arrangements*, Singularities, Part 2 (Arcata, Calif., 1981) Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., vol. 40, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1983, pp. 269–291. MR**713255****7.**Peter Orlik and Hiroaki Terao,*Arrangements of hyperplanes*, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], vol. 300, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992. MR**1217488****8.**Peter Orlik and Hiroaki Terao,*Coxeter arrangements are hereditarily free*, Tohoku Math. J. (2)**45**(1993), no. 3, 369–383. MR**1231562**, https://doi.org/10.2748/tmj/1178225890**9.**Eric Sommers and Peter Trapa,*The adjoint representation in rings of functions*, Represent. Theory**1**(1997), 182–189. MR**1457243**, https://doi.org/10.1090/S1088-4165-97-00029-0

Retrieve articles in *Representation Theory of the American Mathematical Society*
with MSC (1991):
22E46

Retrieve articles in all journals with MSC (1991): 22E46

Additional Information

**J. Matthew Douglass**

Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas 76203

Email:
douglass@unt.edu

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1090/S1088-4165-99-00066-7

Received by editor(s):
March 8, 1999

Received by editor(s) in revised form:
September 28, 1999

Published electronically:
November 9, 1999

Article copyright:
© Copyright 1999
American Mathematical Society