The adjoint representation of a reductive group and hyperplane arrangements

Author:
J. Matthew Douglass

Journal:
Represent. Theory **3** (1999), 444-456

MSC (1991):
Primary 22E46

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1090/S1088-4165-99-00066-7

Published electronically:
November 9, 1999

MathSciNet review:
1722107

Full-text PDF

Abstract | References | Similar Articles | Additional Information

Abstract: Let be a connected reductive algebraic group with Lie algebra defined over an algebraically closed field, , with . Fix a parabolic subgroup of with Levi decomposition where is the unipotent radical of . Let and let denote the center of . Let be a maximal torus in with Lie algebra . Then the root system of is a subset of and by restriction to , the roots of in determine an arrangement of hyperplanes in we denote by . In this paper we construct an isomorphism of graded -modules , where is the -module of derivations of . We also show that and are isomorphic graded -modules, so and are isomorphic, graded -modules. It follows immediately that is a free hyperplane arrangement. This result has been proved using case-by-case arguments by Orlik and Terao. By keeping track of the gradings involved, and recalling that affords a self-dual representation of , we recover a result of Sommers, Trapa, and Broer which states that the degrees in which the adjoint representation of occurs as a constituent of the graded, rational -module are the exponents of . This result has also been proved, again using case-by-case arguments, by Sommers and Trapa and independently by Broer.

**1.**W. Borho. Über Schichten halbeinfacher Lie-Algebren.*Invent. Math.*, 65:283-317, 1981. MR**83b:17006****2.**A. Broer. The sum of generalized exponents and Chevalley's restriction theorem for modules of covariants.*Indag. Math.*, 6:385-396, 1995. MR**96j:20058****3.**A. Broer. Lectures on decomposition classes. In*Representation Theory and Algebraic Geometry, Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute, Montreal, Canada, July 28 - August 8, 1997*(A. Broer, editor). Kluwer, 1998. MR**99:03****4.**A. Broer. Hyperplane arrangements, Springer representations, and exponents. In*Advances in Geometry*, volume 172 of*Progress in Mathematics*(J. Brylinski, editor). Birkhäuser, 1999. MR**99:07****5.**B. Kostant. Lie group representations on polynomial rings.*Amer. J. Math.*, 85:327-404, 1963. MR**28:1252****6.**P. Orlik and L. Solomon. Coxeter arrangements. In*Singularities*, volume 40 of*Proc. Symp. Pure Math.*, pages 269-292, Amer. Math. Soc., 1983. MR**85b:32016****7.**P. Orlik and H. Terao.*Arrangements of Hyperplanes*. Springer-Verlag, 1992. MR**94e:52014****8.**P. Orlik and H. Terao. Coxeter arrangements are hereditarily free.*Tôhoku Math. J.*, 45:369-383, 1993. MR**94h:52023****9.**E. Sommers and P. Trapa. The adjoint representation in rings of functions.*Represent. Theory*, 1:182-189, 1997. MR**98i:22020**

Retrieve articles in *Representation Theory of the American Mathematical Society*
with MSC (1991):
22E46

Retrieve articles in all journals with MSC (1991): 22E46

Additional Information

**J. Matthew Douglass**

Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas 76203

Email:
douglass@unt.edu

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1090/S1088-4165-99-00066-7

Received by editor(s):
March 8, 1999

Received by editor(s) in revised form:
September 28, 1999

Published electronically:
November 9, 1999

Article copyright:
© Copyright 1999
American Mathematical Society