|
All first-order averaging techniques for a posteriori finite element error control on unstructured grids are efficient and reliable
Author(s):
C.
Carstensen.
Journal:
Math. Comp.
73
(2004),
1153-1165.
MSC (2000):
Primary 65N30;
Secondary 65N15
Posted:
August 12, 2003
MathSciNet review:
2047082
Retrieve article in:
PDF
This article is available free of charge
Abstract |
References |
Similar articles |
Additional information
Abstract:
All first-order averaging or gradient-recovery operators for lowest-order finite element methods are shown to allow for an efficient a posteriori error estimation in an isotropic, elliptic model problem in a bounded Lipschitz domain in . Given a piecewise constant discrete flux (that is the gradient of a discrete displacement) as an approximation to the unknown exact flux (that is the gradient of the exact displacement), recent results verify efficiency and reliability of
in the sense that is a lower and upper bound of the flux error up to multiplicative constants and higher-order terms. The averaging space consists of piecewise polynomial and globally continuous finite element functions in components with carefully designed boundary conditions. The minimal value is frequently replaced by some averaging operator applied within a simple post-processing to . The result provides a reliable error bound with . This paper establishes and so equivalence of and . This implies efficiency of for a large class of patchwise averaging techniques which includes the ZZ-gradient-recovery technique. The bound established for tetrahedral finite elements appears striking in that the shape of the elements does not enter: The equivalence is robust with respect to anisotropic meshes. The main arguments in the proof are Ascoli's lemma, a strengthened Cauchy inequality, and elementary calculations with mass matrices.
References:
-
- [AO]
- M. AINSWORTH, J.T ODEN: A posteriori error estimation in finite element analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2001. MR 2003b:65001
- [BS]
- I. BABUSSKA, T. STROUBOULIS: The Finite Element Method and its Reliability. Oxford University Press, 2001. MR 2002k:65001
- [BC1]
- S. BARTELS, C. CARSTENSEN: Each averaging technique yields reliable a posteriori error control in FEM on unstructured grids. Part II: Higher order FEM. Math. Comp. 71 (2002) 971-994.MR 2003e:65207
- [BC2]
- S. BARTELS, C. CARSTENSEN: Averaging techniques yield reliable a posteriori finite element error control for obstacle problems. Numer. Math. (2003) to appear.
- [BR]
- R. BECKER, R. RANNACHER: A feed-back approach to error control in finite element methods: basic analysis and examples. East-West Journal of Numerical Mathematics 4 Number 4 (1996) 237-264. MR 98m:65185
- [B]
- D. BRAESS: Enhanced assumed strain elements and locking in membrane problems, Comp. Meths. Appl. Mech. Engrg. 165 (1998) 155-174.MR 2000j:74084
- [C]
- C. CARSTENSEN: Quasi-interpolation and a posteriori error analysis in finite element method. M2AN 33 (1999) 1187-1202.MR 2001a:65135
- [CA]
- C. CARSTENSEN, J. ALBERTY: Averaging techniques for reliable a posteriori FE-error control in elastoplasticity with hardening. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 192 (2003) 1435-1450.
- [CB]
- C. CARSTENSEN, S. BARTELS: Each averaging technique yields reliable a posteriori error control in FEM on unstructured grids, part I: Low order conforming, nonconforming, and mixed FEM. Math. Comp. 71 (2002) 945-969.MR 2003e:65212
- [CBJ]
- C. CARSTENSEN, S. BARTELS, S. JANSCHE: A posteriori error estimates for nonconforming finite element methods. Numer. Math. 92 (2002) 233-256.MR
- [CF1]
- C. CARSTENSEN, S.A. FUNKEN: Constants in Clément-interpolation error and residual based a posteriori estimates in finite element methods, East-West Journal of Numerical Analysis, 8, 3, 153-256. MR 2002a:65173
- [CF2]
- C. CARSTENSEN, S.A. FUNKEN: Fully reliable localised error control in the FEM, SIAM J. Sci. Comp., 21, 4, 1465-1484. MR 2000k:65205
- [CF3]
- C. CARSTENSEN, S.A. FUNKEN: Averaging technique for FE - a posteriori error control in elasticity. Part I: Conforming FEM. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 190 (2001), pp. 2483-2498, Part II:
-independent estimates. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 190 (2001) 4663-4675. Part III: Locking-free nonconforming FEM. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 191 (2001), no. 8-10, 861-877. MR 2002a:74114, MR 2002d:65140, MR 2002j:65106 - [CF4]
- C. CARSTENSEN, S.A. FUNKEN: A posteriori error control in low-order finite element discretisations of incompressible stationary flow problems. Math. Comp. 70 (2001) 1353-1381.MR 2002f:65157
- [CV]
- C. CARSTENSEN, R. VERFÜRTH: Edge residuals dominate a posteriori error estimates for low order finite element methods, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 36, 5,(1999) 1571-1587.MR 2000g:65115
- [N]
- R. NOCHETTO: Removing the saturation assumption in a posteriori error analysis. Rend., Sci. Mat. Appl., A 127, 67-82 (1994). MR 95c:65187
- [R1]
- R. RODRIGUEZ: Some remarks on Zienkiewicz-Zhu estimator. Int. J. Numer. Meth. in PDE 10 (1994) 625-635. MR 95e:65103
- [R2]
- R. RODRIGUEZ: A posteriori error analysis in the finite element method. Finite element methods. 50 years of the Courant element. Conference held at the University of Jyvaeskylae, Finland, 1993. Inc. Lect. Notes Pure Appl. Math. 164, 389-397 (1994). MR 95g:65158
- [V]
- R. VERFÜRTH: A review of a posteriori error estimation and adaptive mesh-refinement techniques, 1996, Wiley-Teubner.
- [ZZ]
- O.C. ZIENKIEWICZ, J.Z. ZHU: A simple error estimator and adaptive procedure for practical engineering analysis, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engrg., 24 (1987) 337-357. MR 87m:73055
Similar Articles:
Retrieve articles in Mathematics of Computation
with
MSC (2000):
65N30,
65N15
Retrieve articles in all Journals with
MSC (2000):
65N30,
65N15
Additional Information:
C.
Carstensen
Affiliation:
Institute for Applied Mathematics and Numerical Analysis, Vienna University of Technology, Wiedner Hauptstraße 8-10, A-1040 Vienna, Austria
Email:
Carsten.Carstensen@tuwien.ac.at
DOI:
10.1090/S0025-5718-03-01580-1
PII:
S 0025-5718(03)01580-1
Keywords:
A posteriori error estimate,
efficiency,
finite element method,
gradient recovery,
averaging operator,
mixed finite element method,
nonconforming finite element method
Received by editor(s):
July 26, 2002
Received by editor(s) in revised form:
January 1, 2003
Posted:
August 12, 2003
Copyright of article:
Copyright
2003,
American Mathematical Society
|